Search for: "Umpqua Holdings Corporation" Results 1 - 17 of 17
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jan 2012, 9:12 am by William McGrath
On January 11, 2012, Magistrate Judge John Acosta recommended the dismissal of the derivative lawsuit against the Board of Directors of Umpqua Holdings Corporation ("Umpqua") for breach of fiduciary duty. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 9:20 am by William McGrath
In an Opinion and Order dated February 23, 2012, Judge Michael Mosman adopted the January 11, 2012 Findings and Recommendations of Magistrate Judge John Acosta to dismiss the derivative lawsuit against the Board of Directors of Umpqua Holdings Corporation ("Umpqua") for breach of fiduciary duty. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 4:19 am by Broc Romanek
At issue in Davis was a decision by the compensation committee of Umpqua Holdings Corporation to pay increased compensation to certain executive officers for 2010 -- a year in which the bank's performance had improved and met predetermined compensation targets, but total shareholder return was allegedly negative. [read post]
31 May 2011, 5:08 pm by Kevin LaCroix
On May 25, 2011, In the latest example of shareholders suing a company’s board following a negative “say on pay” vote, two union pension funds filed a shareholders’ derivative action claiming that Umpqua Holdings Corporation’s board violated its duties to investor by approving the2010 compensation plan despite the negative shareholder vote.. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 5:00 am by J Robert Brown Jr.
Jan. 11, 2012), the federal magistrate considered a derivative action brought against the board of Umpqua holdings. [read post]
At issue in Davis was a decision by the compensation committee of Umpqua Holdings Corporation to pay increased compensation to certain executive officers for 2010 — a year in which the bank’s performance had improved and met predetermined compensation targets, but total shareholder return was allegedly negative. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 2:00 am by Stephanie Figueroa
Finally, we address a magistrate judge’s recommendation that the Umpqua “Say on Pay” shareholder derivative action be dismissed. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 2:00 am by Stephanie Figueroa
Finally, we discuss decisions granting motions to dismiss “Say on Pay” shareholder suits brought derivatively on behalf of Intersil Corporation, BioMed Realty Trust, Jacobs Engineering Group and Umpqua Holdings Corporation. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 4:38 am by Broc Romanek
Then on Friday - in a midst of a flurry of filings on a day when the markets were closed - Umpqua Holdings Corporation filed this Form 8-K to report it became the eighth failed say-on-pay with only 35% voting in support. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 5:36 am by Broc Romanek
Here's my last word on the subject - a preliminary proxy statement filed by Umpqua Holdings that uses a grid for director qualifications. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 7:44 pm by Alexander J. Davie
 This case is another “say on pay” suit involving a company called Umpqua Holdings Corporation. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 5:00 am by J Robert Brown Jr.
  We have posted pleadings and other primary documents on the Say on Pay cases filed in federal court (Cincinnati Bell; Johnson & Johnson; Umpqua Holdings; Dex One; and Janus Capital) on the DU Corporate Governance web site. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 1:09 am by Kevin LaCroix
The most recent companies to have shareholders vote against their say on pay resolutions are Black and Decker (refer here) and Umpqua Holdings (refer here). [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 12:39 pm by William McGrath
The issues in the Koss Corporation litigation did not include the "neither-admit-nor-deny" policy at the heart of Citigroup, but focused on specific language in the proposed Judgments. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 9:53 am by William McGrath
The Bureau stated that in fiscal year 2011 (the period from October 1, 2009 to September 30, 2011), corporate fraud cases resulted in 242 indictments or informations and 241 convictions. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 1:33 am by Kevin LaCroix
FDIC Files First Failed Bank Lawsuit in Florida: Even though Florida has had the second highest number of bank failures of any of the states during the current bank failure wave (trailing only Georgia), the FDIC had not filed any failed bank lawsuit in Florida—until now. [read post]